Index to The Trinity: Evidence and Issues by Robert Morey

Read it on books.google.com

Guiding question: What must be in order for what is to be what it is?
Or: What must be in order to explain or account for what is?

If Unitarianism is true, what kinds of things should we expect to find in the Bible?

If the Trinity is true, what kinds of things would we expect to find in the Bible?

    Part 1: Prolegomena

  1. Epistemology
  2. The Hermeneutics of God
  3. Orthodoxy and Heresy
  4. Expectations
  5. Only One God
  6. The Incomprehensible God

    7. Part 2: The Old Testament Evidence

  7. A Multi-Personal God
  8. The Theophanies
  9. The Angel of the LORD
  10. God the Father
  11. God the Son
  12. God the Holy Spirit
  13. The Trinity in the Old Testament

    14. Part 3: The Intertestamental Literature

  14. Between the Testaments

    15. Part 4: The New Testament Evidence

  15. Opening Principles
  16. God the Father
  17. God the Son
  18. God the Holy Spirit
  19. The Trinity in the New Testament

    20. Part 5: Historical Evidence

  20. The Early Church

    21. Part 6: Defense of the Faith

  21. Arianism
  22. Modalism

Errata, spelling mistakes and other needed corrections:

  1. p. 174 par. 3 "we must logically denied the..." --> "we must logically deny the..."
  2. p. 179 "the ascension and the session of Christ at the right hand of the Father" --> "the ascension and the seating of Christ at the right hand of the Father"
  3. p. 193 "He will posses them all." --> "He will possess them all."
  4. p. 199 " We, thus, arrive at the situation were" --> "where"
  5. p. 207 Werde --> William Wrede (1859–1906). Wrede's name is misspelled elsewhere too. Do a search and replace.
    Then, Bruckner's name is spelled as "Brückner". His book was not titled: Der Strebe und Auferstehende Gottheiland --> but "Der sterbende und auferstehende Gottheiland". Note the change in capitalization also. German does not capitalize adjectives.
  6. p. 285 the closing quote of "Rules Of Written Evidence “ contains a space and thus the closing quote is actually an opening quote.
  7. p. 291 add a missing "of" in the phrase "a denial of the humanity of Jesus."
  8. p. 291 (next sentence) is missing the word "to" in the phrase "And when we turn to the New Testament"
  9. p. 293 The greek word "σκηνόω" begins with a Latin capital "S". It should be the Greek letter Sigma.
  10. p. 293 The second last word on the page the same word ends with a latin "h". It should be the Greek letter omega.
  11. p. 297 at the bottom of the page the verse reference should be to 1 John 4:2, not the Gospel of John.
  12. p. 298 "logical" --> "logically"
  13. p. 298 "what grounds it is assumed that ...?" --> "what grounds is it assumed that ...?"
  14. p. 298 "John's use of the perfect and present particle" --> "John's use of the perfect and present participle"
  15. p. 299 "descendent" --> "descendant"
  16. p. 300 "session" --> "ascension";
  17. p. 301 "broke" --> "broken"
  18. p. 301 "undue" --> "undo";
  19. p. 302 "posture" --> "posit"???
  20. p. 302 "was is" --> "is"
  21. p. 302 "He" --> "he" in the phrase "to what He is."
  22. p. 303 missing the word "of": "picked a word out of the language";
  23. p. 304 "describedin" --> "described in", "seedof" --> "seed of", also several Greek words use Latin letters instead of Greek letters; this is because the font was a legacy font, not a unicode font.
  24. p. 305 "Philemon" --> "Philippians"; "Sadis" --> "Sardis";
  25. p. 306 "predate it final" --> "predate its final"
  26. p. 308 "All the pronouns Him refers to" --> "All the pronouns Him refer to"
  27. p. 308 "We have placed the pronouns in bold text so the reader can see that they all refer back to Jesus." --> this was not done.
  28. p. 313 the phrase "the days of eternity " contains a space at the end followed by an opening double quote. It should be a closing double quote without that extra space.
  29. p. 316-317 "Bousset" is sometimes written with a single "t", sometimes with double "tt". If you look it up on Wikipedia it is spelled with a single "t". "Werde" is spelled "Wrede" on Wikipedia, et al.
  30. p. 319 par. 3 The greek word for God is written with the latin letters: "Jeos". It should be in unicode letters or formatted in a Greek legacy font. Ditto in the last paragraph on this page.
  31. p. 320 "lo,goj" --> should be in unicode Greek letters; this is because when it was pasted or typed into the document the font was not a unicode font.
    Same sentence where "it became clear the John" --> "it became clear that John"
    Also footnote numbers "71" and "72" should be in superscript;
    "eisegeses" --> "eisegesis"
  32. p. 322 "they would be have to be God" --> "they would have to be God"
  33. p. 326 "monogenges" --> "monogenes"
  34. p. 327 "He was saying that that He" --> "He was saying that He"
  35. p. 328 "punishible" --> "punishable". Also "statisfied" --> "satisfied"
  36. p. 329 Biblical verse reference: (1:1). Shouldn't it be Psa 35:1? Also: "such a idea" --> "such an idea"
  37. p. 330 "what would think" --> "what would you think"
  38. p. 331 "to an objective conclusive." --> "to an objective conclusion." ?
  39. p. 338 (first line) the greek word "φύσεs" ends with a Latin "s". It should be a final sigma, as in "φύσες"
  40. p. 341 "I Howard Marshall" --> "Howard Marshall" ?
    Verse reference: II (Thes. 1:12) --> (II Thes. 1:12)
  41. p. 343 "suporting" --> "supporting"; "Mean-while" --> "Meanwhile"
  42. p. 345 "two or nouns" --> "two nouns" OR "two or more nouns"
  43. p. 347 "Reymond Brown" --> "Raymond Brown"
  44. p. 348 par. 1 a closing quote is missing just before the footnote number 169.
    par. 2 "avoidance's" --> "avoidances".
    There seems to be a period missing following the name Warfield in the same sentence as the comment above.
  45. p. 349 second last line: "we reached the conclusion that that" --> "we reached the conclusion that the"
  46. p. 351 "inter- pretation" --> "interpretation"
  47. p. 354 "made in the later half" --> "made in the latter half"
  48. p. 356 "there would no controversy whatsoever" --> "there would be no controversy whatsoever"
  49. p. 357 "who is not a "idol" " --> "who is not an "idol""
  50. p. 359 "is to complete." --> "is to be complete."
  51. p. 361 "con-roverts" --> "controverts" ?
    "Thayer defines it as "diety"" --> "Thayer defines it as "deity"
  52. p. 363 "Which view is be substantiated" --> "Which view is substantiated" or "Which view is to be substantiated" or "Which view will be substantiated"
  53. p. 365 "naratives" --> "narratives"
  54. p. 369 "that caused it omission" --> "that caused its omission"
  55. p. 469 "Eusibius" --> "Eusebius"
  56. p. 375 "Pss 17:7" --> "Psa 17:7"
    "59:26" --> "59:16" (Isaiah 59 does not have 26 verses!)
    "Tit. 1:4" is repeated twice in the same sentence.
  57. p. 381 "found at the end of verse 14." --> should include the Book and chapter reference: "found at the end of verse Acts 9:14."
    "Pss 105:1" --> "Psa 105:1"
  58. p. 383 "ascrube" --> "ascribe"
  59. p. 386 "Paul's has in view (II Tim. 1:1 cf. 4:1; 8, 14 etc.)." Paul has in view (II Tim. 1:1 cf. 4:1, 8, 14 etc.).
  60. p. 389 "Moffattt" --> "Moffatt" ?
  61. p. 390 "be unto the Him forever and ever." --> "be unto Him forever and ever."
  62. p. 411 "just becuase" --> "just because"
  63. p. 418 "to his people, The" --> "to his people. The"
    "trans-formed" --> "transformed"
  64. p. 423 "This is one of most" --> "This is one of the most"
    opening quote is wrong in "”from along side” of the Father"
    I think the verse references of "in verses 27 and 28" should be changed to "in verses 26 and 27" because they refer to John 15:26-27
  65. p. 425 "proeedeth" --> "proceedeth"
  66. p. 429 "Epheshians" --> "Ephesians"
  67. p. 443 "investi- gations" --> "investigations"
  68. p. 444 reference is incorrect: "Phil. 1:22" --> "Phil. 1:2"
  69. p. 444 reference is incorrect: "Thess. 1:2" --> "II Thess. 1:2"
  70. p. 540 reference is incorrect: "Ps. 61:10" --> "Ps. 76:10"